In the complex tapestry of global politics, the relationship between the United States and Africa stands as a critical area of study. This analysis delves into the geopolitical strategies, historical contexts, and economic influences that shape this dynamic, drawing parallels and contrasts to provide a comprehensive understanding.
There are distinct electoral politics differences between the two democracies. In November 2024, the United States goes to the polls in what will determine whether former President Donald Trump returns to the White House or Vice President Kamala Harris succeeds outgoing President Joe Biden.
The US elections are based on a direct presidential, gubernatorial, and senatorial voting system. In May 2024, South Africa went to elections in a plebiscite that saw the African National Congress (ANC) losing the absolute majority it had garnered since 1994. South Africa, on the other hand, operates a proportional representation voting system where citizens vote for parties, and each party chooses its cabinet, parliamentary, and municipal representatives from party lists. The US has two dominant parties, the Democratic and Republican parties.
Yet, there are a couple of similarities between the two democracies. For instance, race and race relations are hot-button issues.
Migration and migrant populations are equally contentious electoral issues, as are issues of economic inequalities, matters of social justice, unemployment, and variances in the economic wherewithal of various regions. Equally important is that the apex leadership in both countries determines the ebb and flow of the relations between them.
Read also: Property Practitioners Regulatory Authority
In the recent past, geopolitical tensions have sparked contestations on the current and future nature of South Africa-US relations.
Geopolitical Strategies and Historical Context
As a key battleground in the global struggle between democracy and authoritarianism, Africa offers US policymakers insights to navigate competing interests and power dynamics. For a comprehensive view of this competition, this article analyzes American, Chinese, French, and Russian geopolitical strategies; employs a geopolitical analysis of current events, diplomatic maneuvers, and historical lessons; and uses policy documents, expert opinions, and case studies of geopolitical engagements.
Commemorated in March 2024, the 51st anniversary of the end of the Vietnam War serves as a reminder of the enduring struggle between democracy and authoritarianism exemplified by the ongoing proxy wars across the globe. Discussions about the rise of authoritarianism and the proxy wars waged by world superpowers often overlook Africa despite a clear example like the conflict in Libya and Russia’s security involvement in multiple countries.
Since the fall of Muammar al-Qaddafi in 2011, Libya has become a battleground for competing factions backed by foreign powers, including Russia, Türkiye, and the United Arab Emirates, each seeking to advance their strategic interests. Russia’s security involvement, exemplified by its military support in countries like Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic, Libya, Mali, and Niger, combined with China’s investments in infrastructure, natural resources, and trade partnerships, poses a threat to US economic interests on the continent.
During World War II, many African colonies supported Europe in the fight against Nazi Germany, hoping their contributions would be rewarded with independence. After Europe’s liberation in 1945, however, their demands for freedom were met with colonial repression. The resulting disappointment led to several African national liberation movements, which, for the first time since colonialism began, united under the common goal of self-determination and the vision of Africa for African people.
Read also: Amazing Facts About Africa
The legacy of more than a century of European colonization, with arbitrary borders from the Berlin Conference on Africa, created challenges. Ieuan Griffiths argues that the colonial borders are obsolete and do not reflect Africa’s realities. As Saadia Touval notes, rejecting these borders was central to anticolonial nationalism, but newly independent states accepted these borders to avoid conflicts.
The 1964 validation of these borders by the African Union (then the Organization of African Unity) did not prevent disputes, which the United States and the USSR exploited for proxy wars during the Cold War. Thus, Africa found itself trapped between decolonization and superpower rivalry, unable to enjoy fully its hard-won independence.
According to military and security experts, the major proxy wars of the Cold War took place in Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, and Afghanistan. These proxy wars were conventional conflicts between the USSR and the United States fought by allied governments to expand their spheres of influence and secure advanced military equipment.
In Africa, the Cold War proxy wars had a profound and lasting impact. The continent became a battleground for superpower conflicts over the next 50 years and fostered the emergence and entrenchment of authoritarian regimes that remain in power, as highlighted in the study of regime cycles and political change in African autocracies.
American strategy during the Cold War shifted from direct military engagement to more nuanced forms of influence, such as economic aid and covert operations. Initially, the approach focused on containment through military alliances and interventions. Over time, it shifted to covert operations and support for anti-communist regimes, often disregarding democratic principles. This incoherence and inconsistency enabled authoritarianism, as seen in US support for dictatorial regimes that aligned with anti-communist objectives. This strategy facilitated the rise of authoritarian regimes that remain in power today.
Read also: Discover Thula Thula
When the Berlin Wall crumbled in 1989, the world thought the end of the Cold War had come. Euphoria, jubilation, and festive celebrations dominated public lives in Europe. Michael Howard indicates that history has shown that each war, hot or cold, has been followed by cold peace.
Africa was no exception. For 20 years following the fall of the wall, African nations felt the chill across the continent as they recovered from the trauma of post-independence proxy wars and tried to understand the new world order. Conflict transformation is subject to the transformation of relationships and social systems, elements affected by the evolution of the USSR and US relationships through détente and rapprochement.
Part of the West’s strategy for political reform was to make economic aid conditional upon the implementation of free market policies, respect for democracy, and human rights. Although these requirements were often accepted, the West did little to ensure and enforce these policies, allowing regimes like those of Denis Sassou-Nguesso of Congo (Brazzaville) and Paul Biya in Cameroon to gain power and continue the cycles of exploitation and corruption of the Cold War.
The war on terrorism after the September 11 attacks was brutal and dramatic in Africa. Economic development and aid were no longer conditional on respect for democracy and human rights but rather on African nations’ dedication and contribution to the fight against global terrorism.
It has been more than two decades since the United States launched its war against terrorism on the African continent, including through training and security cooperation, yet the results are mixed and not beneficial for African people. Current African leadership has shown its limits; the United States must reconsider its war on terrorism policy and hedge its bets. Africa is not better off today, which partly explains the repeated military coups and their seemingly popular support.
In recent decades, Africa has become a strategic focal point for major global powers, including China, France, Russia, and the United States, each vying for influence across the continent. These external players have impacted the political and security landscape in various African regions.
China's Belt and Road: Is it Good for Africa?
China's Economic Influence and the Belt and Road Initiative
Chinese financing, often provided with fewer conditions than Western alternatives, grants Beijing considerable leverage in shaping African economic policies and securing access to critical resources. Concurrently, Russia’s military engagements, such as providing mercenaries and military advisers, enhance its influence and stabilize regimes favorable to its interests. Both nations, through diplomatic engagements, development aid, and support for authoritarian governments, seek to expand their political foothold.
China kept quiet and behaved as a silent pawn during the Cold War. During this time, it positioned itself globally and established deals that are proving its economic prowess and uncovering its long-term strategy. Today, China is the second-largest economic power, surpassing Japan and Europe and knocking at America’s door.
In 2023, James McBride, Noah Berman, and Andrew Chatzky affirmed that one of China’s biggest maneuvers had been building the Belt and Road Initiative, or the New Silk Road, noting that the ambitious infrastructure project allowed China to expand its influence globally and strengthen its worldwide economic grip. The initiative develops strategic transportation, energy, and water infrastructure, including, but not limited to, the port of Djibouti, the Ethiopia-Kenya railway, the Ethiopia-Djibouti railway, the Ethiopia-Djibouti water pipeline, and the East-West highway in Algeria.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China mentioned that: “China will continue its support for African countries’ efforts to resolve their continent’s issues in their way and make a greater contribution to peace and security in Africa.
One can argue that this support is a great competitive advantage, however, countries in Africa recognize the hidden side of this transaction- the Chinese debt-trap policy. Many African countries realize that their debts are insurmountable, and the only way out is to lose control of some of their infrastructure to China’s benefit, which results in a loss of sovereignty.
The official African narrative that China is investing in Africa is misinterpreted and misinformed. Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center reported in a recent publication that according to its Chinese Loans to Africa Database, between 2000 and 2022, China loaned approximately $170.08 billion to African countries.
The second big Chinese initiative is in BRICS, a nascent economic group consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa that recently invited six more countries to join. China sees BRICS as an alternative to the hegemonic Group of Seven (comprised of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States).
| Category | South Africa | United States |
|---|---|---|
| Area | 1,219,090 km² | 9,525,067 km² |
| Population | 64,007,000 | 340,111,000 |
| Life Expectancy (Males) | 63 years | 76 years |
| Life Expectancy (Females) | 70 years | 81 years |
| Unemployment Rate | 33.2 % | 4.1 % |
| Inflation Rate | 4.70 % | 3.00 % |
| Central Government Debt (% of GDP) | 76.36 % | 102.69 % |
Everyday Life: A Contrast in Cultures
Moving to Africa is a big enough change all on its own, but the day-to-day differences are definitely the ones that are the hardest to get used to. I know that personally I am a creature of habit. When it comes to life at home or school my routine is key. When I set out to get things accomplished at home, the process is usually painless and more or less predictable, which is something I take for granted. Simply put, I like knowing what to expect and getting what I know.
Whenever I go out for dinner in the States, 9 times out of 10 I come home stuffed out of my mind not even sure if I will live another day I’m so full. I feel like it’s a common occurrence due to how much food we are typically given. I never realized how big American portion sizes are until I got here. I can order a meal and it doesn’t come with three sides, a salad and bread and it’s actually a GOOD thing. I can simply enjoy the main dish without overdoing it.
One difference I absolutely love is the prices. Everything here is so cheap! I can get a huge amount of groceries that would normally cost me $100+ in the States and get the same thing here for less than half the price. Going to a nice restaurant is never a problem because it is usually less than $5 for a typical meal including drinks.
Part of being in a 3 million+ populated city is the insane amount of traffic that goes along with it. But here everything about driving is different. The left side is where cars drive, the drivers seat is opposite of what it is in the US, people typically only drive stick-shifts, and finally I have never in my life seen crazier drivers than I have here. People wave in and out and stop and start no matter what road they are on. I have seen my life flash before my eyes on multiple occasions while taking a taxi and have fallen on my face on the bus due to the constant abrupt stops in heavy traffic.
The last, most pronounced difference is the concept of “African Time.” This is basically the overall theme that everyone is more laid-back and relaxed in Africa when it comes to time and punctuality. It really does exist, people. Some love it and others hate it but regardless, it is definitely part of SA culture. Coming from the US you would most likely be fired for coming in tardy to work every day or even a few days, but here it is more or less accepted because, well, everyone else is probably late too! Personally, I thoroughly enjoy this due to my natural tendency to be late to everything.
Popular articles:
tags: #Africa
