Michael Charles Chilufya Sata (6 July 1937 - 28 October 2014) was a Zambian politician who served as the fifth president of Zambia from 2011 until his death in 2014. A social democrat, he led the Patriotic Front (PF), a major political party in Zambia.
Michael Sata
Few political leaders have been able to break away from a ruling party, form their own and within ten years win power. After ten years in opposition, Sata defeated Banda, the incumbent, to win the September 2011 presidential election with a plurality of the vote.
Early Life and Career
Michael Charles Chilufya Sata was born on 6 July 1937, and brought up in Mpika, Northern Province. He worked under the Zambian Police Service as a police officer, then later as railway man and trade unionist during colonial rule. Among other things, he was a porter at Victoria railway station. Sata began actively participating in the politics of Northern Rhodesia in 1963.
Rise Through UNIP and MMD
Following independence, Sata worked his way up through the rank-and-file of the ruling United National Independence Party (UNIP) to the governorship of Lusaka in 1985. As Governor, he made his mark as a man of action with a hands on approach. He cleaned up the streets, patched roadways and built bridges in the city. Afterward he became a member of parliament for Kabwata constituency in Lusaka in 1983. After Frederick Chiluba of the MMD was elected the president of Zambia ahead of Kaunda in 1991, Sata became one of Zambia's most instantly recognisable faces.
Read also: Career Highlights: Chad Michael Murray
Formation of the Patriotic Front (PF)
In 2001, President Chiluba nominated Levy Mwanawasa as the MMD's presidential candidate for the 2001 election. In frustration, Sata left the MMD and set up a new party, the Patriotic Front (PF). The book uses political biography to study Michael Sata’s political career spanning almost 60 years.
Sishuwa Sishuwa's Analysis
On 5 July 2024 a range of high profile commentators, leaders and journalists came together to discuss Dr Sishuwa Sishuwa’s important new book, Party Politics and Populism in Zambia: Michael Sata, 1955 - 2014. Published by James Currey, one of the top global presses in African Studies, Sishuwa Sishuwa’s book Party Politics and Populism in Zambia: Michael Sata and Political Change, 1955 - 2014 is an honest, but critical portrayal of one of the significant political figures of Zambian politics in the last 50 years.
Sishuwa makes a passionate plea for the adoption of political biography as a methodology of studying individual agency in African politics. The central argument of the book is that populism in Africa emerged during the late-colonial period of the 1950s and early 1960s not in the era of multiparty politics and that Sata’s populist political strategies were learnt during his experience as trade unionist and later as junior political official in the United National Independence Party (UNIP) in the early 1960s.
Sishuwa acknowledges the fact already advanced by other scholars that Sata utilized a combination of populist mobilization in urban areas and ethno-regional appeals to his ethnic Bemba-speakers from Luapula and Northern Provinces to build a power base. The book is arranged in five chapters.
- Chapter one deals with Sata’s early life, his education, employment on the Copperbelt as a constable in the colonial police and his trade union activities.
- Chapter two discusses Sata experience mobilizing urban dwellers in Lusaka, his early political activities in UNIP and how he mobilized various constituencies as member of parliament, district governor and later minister of state.
- Chapter three discusses how Sata constructed a power base in the MMD.
- Chapter four traces the succession battles in the MMD, the formation of PF and how Sata sets out to build an alternative power base.
- Chapter five analyses the strategies Sata employed to win power, having failed to defeat the MMD in 2006.
The strategies, which included building a broader coalition, larger than his ethnic Bemba ethnic core and urban provinces of Lusaka and the Copperbelt, may have helped him win power in September 2011. Sishuwa’s arguments are well supported with detailed empirical evidence.
Read also: How Chad Michael Murray and Jared Padalecki Became Friends
Presidential Campaigns and Controversies
Sata contested the September 2006 presidential election as a populist championing the causes of the poor in the face of Mwanawasa's economic reform policies. While others on the slate of candidates contesting the election frequently resorted to personal attacks and insults, Sata's remarks were at times quite equally scathing.
At one campaign event in particular, Sata was reported to have ripped apart a cabbage in front of his supporters. The cabbage was a reference to Mwanawasa's speech impediment, which was the result of an injury sustained in a 1992 car crash. He has also accused Mwanawasa of "selling out" Zambia to international interests, and at one event, he referred to Hong Kong as a country and Taiwan as a sovereign state.
Sata's right-hand man in the campaign was Dr. Guy Scott, the Patriotic Front secretary general. Scott is a white Zambian politician. Initial results from the election gave Sata the lead, but further results put Mwanawasa in first place and pushed Sata into third place.
Sata was arrested in early December 2006, accused of making a false declaration of his assets when applying to run for president in August, along with other charges. On 15 March 2007, Sata was deported from Malawi shortly after arrival.
After losing his passport in London in late 2007, Sata was issued another; however, on 10 November 2007, Minister of Home Affairs Ronnie Shikapwasha announced that Sata's passport was withdrawn temporarily because he had obtained the new passport without following the necessary procedures and proving that he needed a new passport.
Read also: Discover Chad Michael Collins' Career
After Mwanawasa suffered a stroke and was hospitalised in France, Sata questioned the official claims about Mwanawasa's health on 15 July 2008, and he called for a team of doctors to be sent by the Cabinet to examine Mwanawasa; this team would then disclose Mwanawasa's actual condition. Mwanawasa died in office in August 2008.
Sata ran for President for a fourth time in the election held on 20 September 2011. In the early stages of the campaign he was more vitriolic in his anti-Chinese rhetoric, but he later toned down his rhetoric. Results showed him receiving about 43% of the vote against 36% for Banda.
Sata is presented as an ordinary person whose “straight-talking and sheer rudeness to those in authority resonated with the disillusioned that had taken root in urban areas strung by the harshest years of the economic crisis” (p.166). In a typical populist fashion, Sata used public rallies to maximum effect.
Sishuwa argues that, “Sata’s considerable charisma was responsible for large crowds at the rallies and his message of lower taxes, more jobs and money in your pockets resonated well with the unemployed, workers and the poor. With a ready wit, he had something to say about everything and anything. Never at a loss for words, his language was colourful, appealing, discursive, and entertaining.
Presidency and Policies
Sata led his Patriotic Front (PF) to victory in the 2011 elections - the fourth time he had contested them. Sata in fact represented continuity, having served in the 1980s as the extremely successful governor of the capital city of Lusaka under Kaunda. He went on to become minister of local government, labour, and health under Chiluba. It was at this time that he became known as King Cobra, for his ruthlessness towards opponents.
Sata did not serve in the Mwanawasa and Rupiah governments, because he had sought the succession from Chiluba and was disappointed when it went to Mwanawasa - another president who died in office and whose final illness, like Sata’s, was carefully but not completely hidden from the Zambian public.
Sata’s period as president saw marked economic growth, but this depended greatly on increases in prices for minerals such as copper: there are clear signs that the boom has peaked and may now be declining. His scathing attitude towards opponents continued to surface and he never lost his King Cobra tag.
Nonetheless, he made a positive contribution in promoting the intercommunal spirit favoured by Kaunda. The choice of Scott as president is a case in point. Nowhere else in majority-ruled Africa has a white man succeeded, even if temporarily, to the presidency.
Sata had difficulties with the seccession movement in the Lozi kingdom in western Zambia, and his political opponents accused him of human rights abuses, even bringing a complaint to the attention of the Commonwealth secretary general, Kamalesh Sharma, based on alleged breaches of the Harare Commonwealth Declaration on Human Rights.
Sata responded to his opponents and detractors with the robustness that might be expected from someone who had laboured as a manual worker, policeman, London station porter, and even as a taxidermist. Unlike Kaunda, he never postured as an intellectual.
Zambians kept out as president falls ill
Health Issues and Death
Concerns about Sata's health grew during 2014 and some suggested that he was no longer really running the government due to his condition, although the government denied that. He stopped appearing in public, which seemed jarringly uncharacteristic for the notably extroverted and outspoken president. Observers thought he seemed unwell when he opened parliament on 19 September and over the course of the following month he failed to appear in public again.
Sata died in the late evening of 28 October at the King Edward VII's Hospital in London. He was receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. Cabinet Secretary Roland Msiska issued a statement that he died late in the day. President Sata's demise is deeply regretted. His death triggered a presidential by-election in 2015.
Legacy
Michael Sata, who has died aged 77, was the fifth president of Zambia during the half century since the country became independent. A charismatic, forceful but controversial figure, he led the third political party to attain office. Sishuwa concludes that: “It is inconceivable to think of the PF mobilizing voters and emerging as a credible political force without the personality and populist strategy of Sata.” (p.196).
The book makes two important contributions to our understanding of party politics and elections in Africa. First, a political party needs a power base and political mobilization should be targeted to key constituencies or power bases of national leaders based on innovative strategies of relevant campaign messages that relate to their felt needs. Second, identification with one’s ethno-regional group and mobilizing such groups should not be stigmatized, but should be accepted as a normal way of building support bases.
The book is written in a readable form and can appeal to both specialist and general readers. As well as establishing the author as one of the leading authorities on Zambian politics, it covers considerable material on Zambian political history, political parties, party politics, succession and elections covering the period from late colonial to the present time. It could be an important primer for budding politicians who want to learn something about political mobilization and individual agency. The book should be essential reading for students of African history, political science and political sociology at universities.
Popular articles:
tags: #Zambia
