Uganda has consistently held elections since the 1980s at various levels, including Presidential, Parliamentary, District, and Local Councils. Understanding the structure and responsibilities of these local councils is crucial for effective governance and development.
Structure of Local Councils
There are six levels of Local Councils in Uganda. The lowest level is the Local Council I (LC 1 or LC I), responsible for a village or a neighborhood in towns or cities. The area covered by Local Councils II through IV incorporates several of the next lowest levels, while a Local Council V (LC5) is responsible for the entire district. Each Local Council has a certain number of identical positions, such as Chairman and Vice-Chairman.
- LC I: Village or neighborhood level
- LC II - IV: Incorporate several of the next lowest levels
- LC V: Entire district
The Local Council does not transfer nationally.
A village usually consists of between 50 and 70 households and may be home to anywhere between 250 and 1,000 people. Each village is run by a local council - local council I (LCI) - and is governed by a chairperson (LCI chairperson) and nine other executive committee members.
The parish is the next level up from the village. A parish is made up of a number of villages which could range from five to about ten. Each parish has a Local Council II (LCII) Committee, made up of all the chairpersons from the LCIs in the parish. Each LCII will elect, from among themselves, an executive committee. Today, LCIIs are largely involved in settling land disputes and mobilising the community for various activities.
Read also: Voice of Culture and Entertainment
The sub-county is made up of a number of parishes and is run by the sub-county chief on the technical side and by an elected local council III (LCIII) chairperson and his/her executive committee, a kind of parliament at that level, complete with a speaker and deputy speaker. The council consists of elected councilors representing the parishes, other government officials involved in health, development and education, and NGO officials in the sub-county.
LCIII executive committee members of all the sub-counties constitute the local council IV (LCIV). They then elect an LCIV executive committee from among themselves.
A county is made up of several sub-counties. Each county is represented at the national level in parliament in Kampala by an elected member of Parliament (an MP). In major towns, the equivalent of a county is a municipality (which is a set of divisions).
A district is made up of several counties and any municipalities in that area. A district is led by an elected local council V (LCV) chairperson and his executive. There is also an elected LCV Council, with representatives from the sub-counties and technical staff in the district. The council debates budgets, decisions, and bylaws.
On the technical side, the district is led by a Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), appointed by the central government. The district also has heads of various departments such as education, health, environment, and planning, which are responsible for relevant matters in the whole district.
Read also: Used Vehicles in Uganda
Uganda has not held any Local Council elections since 2001(a period of fifteen years, 2001-2017). The 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Article 181(4) states that local government elections will be held after every five years. The delay in holding the election was stated to be due to the high cost involved in holding the election through a secret ballot. Uganda currently has over 60,800 villages, initial budgets indicated that this election would cost over 505bn if it were to be held by secret ballot. The LC1 elections were eventually conducted on the 10th of July 2018 throughout Uganda which was declared a public holiday to allow voters the opportunity to express themselves. This was after 17 years of not holding the local council elections.
Map of the districts of Uganda
Decentralization and Environmental Management
In Uganda, environmental and natural resource management is decentralized and has been the responsibility of local districts since 1996. This environmental management arrangement was intended to increase local ownership and improve environmental policy. This decentralization of environmental and natural resource management has become a substantial and integral part of this policy.
Since the early 1990s, many countries have promoted decentralized environmental governance as part of a broader trend toward the decentralization of governmental responsibilities; this decentralization is designed to improve effectiveness, efficiency, transparency, and democracy. Uganda has been hailed as a positive example in Africa because of its radical shifting of responsibilities to the local (district) level, including considerable human and financial resources.
The decentralization of natural resource management in Africa is located at the intersection among good governance and democracy, development and poverty alleviation, and community-based resource management and local resource rights. Decentralized environmental and natural resource management would allow local communities to be actively involved and to address their main environmental problems in ways that suit their local needs.
Read also: Understanding Ugandan Politics
However, studies of decentralized environmental governance suggest that different programs in Africa have failed to effectively deliver on their promises both to the community and to the environment. These disappointing results are at least partly attributed to the difficulties of improving environmental performance under the conditions of structural poverty and in situations where the local community is highly dependent on natural resources.
The tension between technical staff and locally elected officials who legitimately claim they represent their constituents. The tension between environmental and natural resource management and other policy domains such as health, education, agriculture, and economic development.
Challenges and Dynamics of Decentralization
Political decentralization became popular in the 1980s and continued to gain the support of many African governments in the 1990s. Despite its popularity, the precise definition of decentralization and the best model for its implementation remain unclear. The results of political decentralization are not necessarily determined by the selected model but, rather, by the interactions among the model, the implementation process, and the specific local and national dynamics through which decentralization is effected.
These dynamics take place at three levels:
- Individual Level: Influenced by values, culture, training, and attitudes of local government personnel.
- Institutional Level: Impact relates to local government structures, procedures, and operating rules.
- Systemic Level: Affected by policy and legal frameworks and the relations of local governmental authorities with other actors.
Undertaking such a radical public sector reform as the decentralization of environmental policy under the difficult circumstances prevailing in sub-Saharan Africa is complicated. State institutions dispose of limited financial and human resources, while slow (or even negative) economic growth and a high dependence on foreign aid complicate the context even further.
From only 33 districts in 1986, the number grew to 45 in 1998, 56 in 2003, and to 80 by 2008. On the other hand, this growing number of districts necessitated continuous administrative reorganization at the local level; this meant that more financial resources were spent on administrative tasks and development budgets thinned.
In the early phase of decentralization, local authorities could use the graduated tax they collected; in the 1999-2000 fiscal year, this tax contributed to 67% of the locally generated revenues. However, over the years these incomes declined.
The government of President Museveni has taken important steps towards establishing a human rights culture in Uganda, and marked a clear break with the abusive dictatorships which preceeded it. Some newly created institutions, such as the Uganda Human Rights Commission, have played an important role in fostering a viable human rights culture in Uganda.
The Ugandan parliament has become a vocal and progressive institution, and its actions in criticizing government corruption and abuse of office suggest a significant amount of independence from the executive branch. In accordance with the 1995 constitution, Uganda has embarked on an ambitious program of government decentralization which aims to increase the role civilians play at all levels of government.
One of the important impacts of the political reforms implemented by the NRM administration has been the empowerment of women, a traditionally marginalized sector of society, at all levels of government. The administration has put into action strong affirmative action programs which aim to raise the level of participation of women in government, and women are represented in significant numbers at both the local and national level.
Instead of political parties which were viewed as divisive, Museveni introduced the idea of a "no-party" system, one supposedly all-inclusive movement in which individual candidates would run for elections based on their personal merit.
Local governments to be empowered in protecting environment
Popular articles:
tags: #Uganda
